Media God Bless America
In 1938, composer Irving Berlin dusted off an old piece of music to create a new national hit
John Steinbeck once commented that the decade of the 1930s in America read like a script. It had three defined structural parts: a beginning, middle, and end. The beginning came suddenly and unexpectedly with the crash of the stock market in October, 1929. The middle played out with the intensification of life-shattering dust storms, the despair of a broken economy, job loss, and rampant poverty. The end was a build up toward war and the dramatic “curtain call” of Pearl Harbor.
The disasters that hit America in the 1930s brought upheaval in the political spectrum as well. It could be argued that the political scene of the time mirrored the structure of the larger script: the beginning saw the Hoover administration condemned for failure to cope effectively with the disasters; the middle, starting with the election of 1932, brought in Franklin D. Roosevelt and the reclaim efforts shaped by his “New Deal” programs; the end saw growing criticism and rebellion against some of FDR’s “socialist” programs and the shift into a war preparation mode. As many historians have observed, America would be – perhaps forever – a different place after the decade of the 1930s.
The following questions and activities are forged to help students expand their understanding of the shifting political framework of the 1930s and the New Deal as part of the backdrop for study of John Steinbeck’s The Grapes of Wrath.
Following the Crash of 1929, President Herbert Hoover introduced a few changes in his policy of government, but by and large maintained the policies and general philosophy of government that he had advocated and followed since the beginning of his administration.
Working with a collaborative partner, construct a brief written analysis of Hoover’s basic approach of “volunteer individualism” in government. Include, as well, reference to some of the economic factors, for instance, international economic crises that eroded the success of Hoover’s policy.
FDR hit the ground running when he took office in 1932. Within the first 100 days, according to National Archives records, fifteen pieces of major legislation were put in place in his rapid fire effort to restore the health of the nation. Historians generally think of the New Deal as having two parts: the first part dedicated to bringing broad strokes of immediate relief to the devastating issues plaguing America; the second part putting strategies in place for the reshaping of public policy in America. FDR’s New Deal is often referred to as the “alphabet soup” program because of the wide collection of acronyms labeling the titles of the agencies created for the above-stated purposes.
Collaborate with two or three classmates to develop an overview of FDR’s introduction of the New Deal and the target areas of the various agencies and programs created to effect recovery and reshape public policy, recognizing that many of the programs put in place under that auspices are still cornerstones of present day public policy.
Consider parceling out the references listed below for individual collaborative members in your group to research, then pooling specific information on each topic to create the above overview:
FDR recognized that to get the public to understand and accept the federal government’s level of “invasion” into public and private affairs that his initiatives required, he had to launch an immediate marketing blitz. He undertook this challenge on several fronts. Develop a brief written background explanation of the mission of each of the following “marketing” devices:
“Fireside Chats”, via radio
NRA “Blue Eagle” stickers, flags and pledges (to be displayed in residential and business windows)
An NRA New York City Parade
A range of advertising posters
Briefly define the responsibilities of each of the following agencies that represent some of the major initiatives FDR put in place as part of the New Deal:
AAA - Agricultural Adjustment Administration
CCC - Civilian Conservation Corps
FDIC - Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
NRA - National Recovery Act
WPA - Works Progress Administration
FDR’s initiatives launched in the New Deal were enthusiastically endorsed at the beginning of his tenure. As recovery from the Great Depression took hold, however, FDR’s recovery and reform measures increasingly drew sharp criticism and generated hostility and tensions.
Include in your statement a brief explanation of what groups continued to back FDR’s programs and what groups attacked them and the main reasons behind these disparate positions.
Develop a three to five page essay in which you explain the background and/or implication of one or a segment of one of the following assertions. Shape a one-sentence thesis to serve as the controlling purpose for development of your essay:
Several of FDR’s public policy initiatives which changed the face of America in dramatic ways still govern various aspects of contemporary public life, particularly policies related to such aspects as unionizing, entitlement programs, fair practices in industry, deposit protection, farm subsidies – to name a few.
Fear, in various forms, took shape during the 1930’s, but one of the strongest fears among many in the populace was of the strong “leftist” movement that seemed to be taking hold. In the eyes of many, the New Deal seemed to be creating a climate for promoting such a movement.
A related fear, perceived by many, to be an agent of the “leftist” movement was the infiltration of communist advocates – “Red” recruiters, who were particularly active among the migrant groups on the West Coast.
Consider launching a class discussion about how you and your classmates would have responded to Roosevelt’s Great Depression “reclaim” policies.
Writer
Jayne Karsten
Producer
Kenny Neal
Updated
November 4, 2019
In 1938, composer Irving Berlin dusted off an old piece of music to create a new national hit
Folk singer Woody Guthrie celebrates America’s bounty and protests that not all Americans were getting their fair share
Generous support for educational programs at the Kennedy Center is provided by the U.S. Department of Education.
Gifts and grants to educational programs at the Kennedy Center are provided by The Paul M. Angell Family Foundation; Bank of America; Capital One; The Morris and Gwendolyn Cafritz Foundation; Carnegie Corporation of New York; The Ednah Root Foundation; Harman Family Foundation; William R. Kenan, Jr. Charitable Trust; the Kimsey Endowment; The Kiplinger Foundation; Laird Norton Family Foundation; Lois and Richard England Family Foundation; Dr. Gary Mather and Ms. Christina Co Mather; The Markow Totevy Foundation; Dr. Gerald and Paula McNichols Foundation; The Morningstar Foundation; Myra and Leura Younker Endowment Fund; The Irene Pollin Audience Development and Community Engagement Initiatives;
Prince Charitable Trusts; Dr. Deborah Rose and Dr. Jan A. J. Stolwijk; Rosemary Kennedy Education Fund; The Embassy of the United Arab Emirates; The Victory Foundation; The Volgenau Foundation; Volkswagen Group of America; Jackie Washington; GRoW @ Annenberg and Gregory Annenberg Weingarten and Family; Wells Fargo; and generous contributors to the Abe Fortas Memorial Fund and by a major gift to the fund from the late Carolyn E. Agger, widow of Abe Fortas. Additional support is provided by the National Committee for the Performing Arts..
The content of these programs may have been developed under a grant from the U.S. Department of Education but does not necessarily represent the policy of the U.S. Department of Education. You should not assume endorsement by the federal government.